Confidence

Saying Less Is Why People Take You More Seriously

You send a proposal you are pleased with. An hour later you send a second message apologising for its length, offering to cut it down, and mentioning that the budget is negotiable. The client had objected to none of it. Both concessions are now on the table, and the price only moves one way.

Almost everyone does a version of this, and almost everyone believes they are being considerate. What the other person receives is different information: that you are not sure the first thing you said was enough.

A pause reads as composure. Volume reads as need.

People hear a silence and fill it in your favour. They hear extra words and hear somebody working hard to be agreed with. The strange part is that the extra words are rarely aimed at the other person's understanding at all. They are aimed at your own nerves, and the other person can tell the difference even if they could not explain how.

This is not about being cold or withholding. It is about noticing that most of what you add after your actual point is aimed at yourself.

Where to start

  1. Cut the softening paragraph. Whatever you wrote after the ask, delete it once and send. You will feel the absence of it far more than the recipient will.
  2. Make one request in one sentence. Not because brevity is a virtue in itself, but because a request that needs three sentences to be safe is usually a request you are not yet sure you are allowed to make.
  3. Answer once. When someone pushes back or asks you to justify, give your reason and stop. The second reason is where people begin to lose the argument they were winning, because it signals that the first one was not enough.

Try it for a week and watch what happens to how quickly you get answers. Not because you have become strategic, but because you have stopped handing people the case against you before they had asked for one.

Confidence is mostly the sentence you decided not to add.

Saying less is not concealment. It is refusing to buy agreement with extra words — and discovering, fairly quickly, that most of them were never required.

The laws behind this

This piece comes out of the following entries. They are worth reading in full — each one carries its own explanation, a real example and a single practice for the day:

Where this sits

This article belongs to the Quiet Confidence path — 7 days, one law at a time, with something to try and a question to sit with each day.

Start the Quiet Confidence path →

Keep reading

Next in the journal

One law a day, before you have to think about it

The journal is where the laws meet a specific problem. The app is where they arrive daily, on your Lock Screen and Home Screen widget.

Download on the App Store

Laws of Power is independent commentary on principles popularised in The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene and Joost Elffers. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the authors or their publishers, and it does not reproduce the book.